As I read this week’s readings, and watch the video lesson,
one thought kept running through my head.
Learners (and people in general) seem to live by an “Economy of Effort”
generalization, applying their time and energy to tasks or other functions
which they believe will benefit them, interest them, or be necessary to their
survival. This is where motivation comes
into play in designing instruction- designers ultimately want their product to
be used and lead to the successful education of the learners. As such, designers must keep in mind the
following concepts in developing the training (these were derived from a
combination of Keller and Burkman (1993) and Dr. Glazewski’s online
presentation:
- Selective Attention of the learner
- What information will they use, and what will they use it for
- What are they interested in
- What drives the learner
- What are the learning goals
- What does the learner need to know
- What our resources
- What are our constraints
- Who are the learners
Clearly, the designer must take
a keen interest in knowing the intended audience. But a designers sphere of influence is much broader- a key take away from this
week’s lesson is that motivation does not rest solely with the learner;
Instructional Designers can play a significant role in inspiring motivation
through design and content decisions. As
Keller and Burkman (1993) stated in the very introduction to their article,
motivational factors fall into two categories:
- Motivating the student: understanding motivational factors internal to the student
- Design elements which can stimulate attention, and increase learner awareness of how the information fits their motivations
There is some overlap between these two factors, especially
in using learning theories such as Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development, self-efficacy,
learner control, etc. (See Epilogue below)
As a novice designer (novice
may actually be giving myself too much credit), I am borderline overwhelmed
with the actual design elements, and the prescriptions/principles thereof that exist for effective
design. These can be leveraged to help engage an otherwise unmotivated learner, both in the way the material is presented (why this is important) and the subliminal (avoiding overwhelming designs that deter learners).
The 4 factors which Dr.
Glazewski discussed (Interaction, Engagement, Structure, Complexity) each exist
on a sliding scale that are independently adjusted given the specific
scenario. Those factors dictate the
content, which in turn dictates the format.
As the format comes together, tools such as font, color, layout,
graphics, photos, text guidelines (10-12 words per line, etc.), writing style,
and so on, each vary on their own sliding scale. Even this week’s and last
week’s lesson had some overlap, but variations as well.
I suspect that this is only the tip of the
iceberg, and am wondering if there is some sort of design checklist or
flowchart that can help budding designers with quick references as to commonly
accepted or recommended design principles for various situations. I might try to put one together on my own,
but if anyone has any useful links, I would be grateful!
-Bryan
We live in a revolutionary time in which many of the learner centered design elements, such as learner control, pacing, difficulty level, etc. no longer must be designed to fit the masses, though that is prevalent in many educational and professional training sessions. But web access, online training, and other digital resources have provided tools to learners to have more control over their learning experience. This really relies on the learners own motivation. In my experience with these tools, because there are no requirements for the audience to engage in learning in these forums, the design must be effective in maintaining the learners attention. A few free examples that come to mind are:
- Khan Academy: http://www.khanacademy.org (Wide array of subjects)
- LiveMocha: http://www.livemocha.com (Language Learning)
- 43 Things: http://www.43things.com (Goal Setting)
Hi Bryan,
ReplyDeleteAfter reading your post, I tried to find checklists of common design principles across various contexts but had a hard time finding them. I am not sure if this is what you were looking for, but this is a checklist for a color graphics page: http://colorusage.arc.nasa.gov/graphics_page_design.php
I think it is a great idea/ exercise for us IDers to compile a checklist as we are developing our own projects or reading examples of well-designed projects.
Designing and developing an infographic was much more difficult that I thought. I thought I had planned out the details well, however when I opened up InDesign I was stuck on every step. Although my end-product appears quite simple, it took a lot of time readjusting fonts, colors, images and graphs. What would you have done differently if you had another chance to create an infographic?
Thanks again for a great post!
I don't think there will ever be an all-purpose-checklist for instructional designers. I think we learn by doing, literally. The highly contextual characteristics of design requires us to be immersed in the specific situation where target learning happens. Only after that, we are able create something "working" for the target learners. However, after immersing in one situation for long, and if you move on to a next learning situation, you will feel stuck at the beginning--like how you would have felt in the first instructional situation, but the time it takes to ease that off seems to decrease in general. At least, that's how I felt. You build your own repertoire and you get used to the chaos. Haha.
ReplyDelete